Public rules set minimum duties, prohibited practices, standards, or market conditions.
May work well when: harm can be defined and prevented more efficiently than repaired case by case
Common limits: capture, outdated rules, compliance burden, evasion, or barriers to entry
Requires: legal authority, expertise, inspection, adjudication, and revision
Example areas: workplace safety, privacy, utilities, product standards
Related guarantees: Work, Digital rights, Environment
Investigators, inspectors, prosecutors, or private actions make existing rules meaningful.
May work well when: violations are detectable and remedies deter harm or make people whole
Common limits: underfunding, selective enforcement, delay, excessive discretion, and procedural unfairness
Requires: evidence, staffing, due process, penalties, remedies, and public reporting
Example areas: wage theft, fraud, civil rights, pollution
Related guarantees: Work, Citizenship, Consumers
Law and institutions constrain monopoly conduct and preserve competitive opportunity.
May work well when: entry, choice, bargaining power, and innovation are harmed by conduct or structure
Common limits: slow litigation, uncertain remedies, market-definition disputes, and overdeterrence
Requires: economic and legal capacity, merger review, remedies, and sector knowledge
Example areas: platforms, agriculture, health care, payments
Related guarantees: Fair markets, Digital rights, Work
People and oversight bodies receive comparable information about price, risk, ownership, performance, or influence.
May work well when: information can change choice or enable enforcement without dictating a result
Common limits: information overload, strategic compliance, privacy harm, and weak remedies
Requires: standard definitions, accessible presentation, audit, privacy, and consequences for false statements
Example areas: fees, campaign money, algorithmic notices, product risk
Related guarantees: Consumers, Democracy, Markets
A system selects a protective starting choice while preserving meaningful ability to opt out.
May work well when: inaction is common and the default can improve outcomes without eliminating choice
Common limits: paternalism, bad defaults, difficult exit, and manipulation by the rule designer
Requires: evidence, easy exit, notice, periodic review, and attention to distribution
Example areas: retirement enrollment, privacy, renewal, benefit enrollment
Related guarantees: Life’s risks, Digital rights, Work